Sunday, March 29, 2009

A Lesson on Health Care From Massachusetts - NYTimes.com

In the March 28th NYT:
In any effort to restructure American health care, two interconnected goals inevitably compete for primacy. One is providing health coverage to the uninsured...The other is slowing the relentless and unsustainable growth of health costs...President Obama['s] ...positioning suggests he has put cost first.... Mr. Obama’s strategy is to sell the expansion of access — largely through public insurance programs — as inseparable from serious efforts at innovation and restraint...[T]he lawmakers and strategists behind the Massachusetts plan strongly defend their incremental approach. Only by deferring the big decisions on cost containment, they said in recent interviews, was it possible to build a consensus among doctors, hospitals, insurers, consumers, employers and workers for the requirement that all residents have health insurance.

“The [Massechusetts] concept,” Mr. Kingsdale said, “[was] to sequence reform in some way to do the really hard thing, which is expanding access, before we do the nearly impossible thing, which is containing costs. [For the US] don’t want to end up holding 50 million uninsured hostage to cost containment.” ***Massachusetts did not create [a government sponsored] plan [such as being floated by the Obama administration], choosing instead to offer subsidies that make commercial policies more affordable. Diane Archer, co-director of the Health Care for All Project at the left-leaning Institute for America’s Future, questioned whether that put enough competitive pressure on insurers. “If we want to bend that cost curve down, it’s through the public option that we’re going to do it,” she said. .... Although health reformers in Massachusetts acknowledge that the fiscal and political landscape in Washington is profoundly different, there is broad agreement among them about the importance of mandating coverage for adults. The insurance lobby has said that if Washington required coverage for all, it would end the practice of denying coverage to those with pre-existing health conditions. ...If history is a guide, the success of health reform may depend on whether the White House and Congress can give interest groups enough to keep them on board.

via A Lesson on Health Care From Massachusetts - NYTimes.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment